Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Procurement Management Services

Questions and Answers for bid: 100-DD04
(5)

Bid Number : 100-DD04  Opening Date : June 3, 2004
Bid Title : ONLINE ANALYTICAL PROCESSING / BUSINESS INTELLIGEN 
Buyer : L. Leasburg-Kramer 
Subject : Answer to sumitted Questions 
Question : Questions for RFP #100-DD04: Online Analytical Processing / Business Intelligence System 1. Who are your targeted end users? Is it an objective of the district to have each teacher in the district using the OLAP/BI tool to inform instruction and drive school improvement? Please indicate which end-users will be using the OLAP/BI tool. 0 District Administrators 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Counselors 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Principals 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Teachers/Faculty 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Other 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 2. How do you currently disseminate analysis information to your end users? Do you have a relatively quick and easy way for staff to request new analyses of existing data sets? 3. Do you plan to implement this in the entire district all at once or phase it in? If phased in, by geographic region? School type groupings? End user roles? Other (please specify)? 4. Regarding your data sources: § We’re assuming the district uses individual central systems for Student Information, Finance, Human Resources, and Transportation. Is this correct? We also assume you have multiple student assessments to analyze. How many standardized assessments do you use (e.g. FCAT, ACT, SAT) § How many unique district assessments do you want to analyze? § Will you want to analyze and report on the district’s survey data and community polling?.If so, is most of this data in a consistent data format survey-to-survey and year to year?. If not, about how many different data formats will we need to work with? § What other data sources would you want to analyze using the BI/OLAP tool (Attendance, Health, Cafeteria, etc.)? § So we can properly assess the work related to your administrative system data, please respond to the attached System Information document. 5. Does the district want sizing information for server hardware? (If so, we’ll need to gather some more detailed information about projected usage levels and extent of data) 6. Do you have an existing data clean up process for importing or exporting data into your environment? 7. Will the selected vendor be responsible for providing end-user training materials or training end-users on the application? Will you look to the vendor to arrange for training or consulting on staff development for data driven decision-making? Detailed System Information Provide the following information only for those systems that contain data you would like to include in the initial rollout of the OLAP/BI. 0 Student Information System Name of system: RDBMS or Vendor Product (i.e., SASI III): Platform: Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No Unique student IDs throughout district: 0 Yes 0 No Enrollment statistics in SIS: 0 Testing and Assessment Data Please list the standardized tests you will use to support analysis: Specify the format that the data is received in (i.e., Tape, CD, FTP, flat file, etc.): Please describe the availability of the data (i.e., the data is in the district; the data is at another location): Finance System Name of system: RDBMS or Vendor Product: Platform: Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Human Resources System Name of system: RDBMS or Vendor Product: Platform: Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Transportation System Name of system: RDBMS or Vendor Product: Platform: Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Other Administrative/Data systems Name of system: RDBMS or Vendor Product: Server Platform:. Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No  
Answer : Responses follows each question Questions for RFP #100-DD04: Online Analytical Processing / Business Intelligence System 1. Who are your targeted end users? All district administrators and educators. Is it an objective of the district to have each teacher in the district using the OLAP/BI tool to inform instruction and drive school improvement? Yes. Please indicate which end-users will be using the OLAP/BI tool. 0 District Administrators 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Counselors 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Principals 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Teachers/Faculty 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 0 Other Business Power Users 0Daily 0Weekly 0Monthly 0Other 2. How do you currently disseminate analysis information to your end users? A combination of; mainframe printed reports, web based dynamic Crystal or SQL Reporting Services reports and power user ODBC connectivity to the data warehouses. Do you have a relatively quick and easy way for staff to request new analyses of existing data sets? Power users have ODBC connections to data warehouse views and use Excel, Access, SPSS or SAS. All official statistical analysis is obtained through the district’s Data Analysis department who use SAS on both mainframe and data warehouse information sources. 3. Do you plan to implement this in the entire district all at once or phase it in? Phased. If phased in, by geographic region? School type groupings? End user roles? Other (please specify)? Likely end-user roles but not yet determined. 4. Regarding your data sources: § We’re assuming the district uses individual central systems for Student Information, Finance, Human Resources, and Transportation. Is this correct? Yes, these are systems on the mainframe (in ADABAS and/or VSAM), in many cases this data is extracted from these systems nightly and loaded to the data warehouses (SQL Server 2000). § We also assume you have multiple student assessments to analyze. How many standardized assessments do you use (e.g. FCAT, ACT, SAT)? Anticipated for 2004-05 and beyond are 12 standardized testing programs, including district programs: (1) grade 2 & 3 Stanford; (2) grades 1 – 11 SRI or replacement; state programs: (3) kindergarten SRUSS, (4) grade 10 PSAT, (5) FCAT writing, (6) grades 3 – 10 FCAT SSS, (7) grades 3-10 FCAT NRT, (8) FCAT graduation, (9) grades K - 12 EPAS; and national programs: (10) AP exams, (11) ACT & (12) SAT. Please note that some programs have multiple administrations in a given school year. § How many unique district assessments do you want to analyze? The set of standards-based progress tests, administered 4 times annually, at grades 2 – 10, in reading, writing, mathematics, and science. § Will you want to analyze and report on the district’s survey data and community polling? Not at this time, we use survey software that includes analysis functionality.If so, is most of this data in a consistent data format survey-to-survey and year to year? No. If not, about how many different data formats will we need to work with? Unknown. § What other data sources would you want to analyze using the BI/OLAP tool (Attendance, Health, Cafeteria, etc.)? School site administrators and instructional staff would find it valuable to analyze assessment/instructional data from instructional software programs running in their computer labs and classrooms. This data is not centrally collected/maintained at the district computer center and may be unique from school to school, available only on their LANs. § So we can properly assess the work related to your administrative system data, please respond to the attached System Information document. 5. Does the district want sizing information for server hardware? Yes. Estimate 500 or less power users and up to 25,000 casual query/report users. Current environment is two (2) active/passive clustered quad-Itanium 64 bit database servers handling application demand and two (2) dual Zeon servers for query demand. Both fiber connected to a six (6) terra-byte SAN (If so, we’ll need to gather some more detailed information about projected usage levels and extent of data) 6. Do you have an existing data clean up process for importing or exporting data into your environment? Current ETL process uses no tools other than mainframe COBOL extract programs and DTS load. Limited data clean-up. 7. Will the selected vendor be responsible for providing end-user training materials or training end-users on the application? Vendors can propose any training paradigm (train the trainer, train all users, provide only materials, etc.) they wish, but it is reasonable that they make training materials available to MDCPS for use, copy and distribution in any case. Though there is no specific training requirement in the RFP, district training cost associated with a product is one of the stated evaluation criteria (page 5 of RFP). Will you look to the vendor to arrange for training or consulting on staff development for data driven decision-making? See above, it is up to the vendor to propose a training paradigm, MDCPS will fill any training gaps and overall training cost to the district will be considered during evaluation as stated in the RFP. Detailed System Information Provide the following information only for those systems that contain data you would like to include in the initial rollout of the OLAP/BI. Note the following: MDCPS data warehouses and RDMS databases are in MS SQL 2000 with enterprise level, processor based licensing. Mainframe source system data is in SAGA ADABAS or VSAM. Most data taken from mainframe source systems and implemented in the data warehouses is de-normalized and maintained in its source form. Warehouse Transportation data and some HR data is normalized and multi-dimensional. MDCPS has planned and modeled a 3rd normal form data warehouse feeding multi-dimensional data marts. No date has yet been established for implementation, therefore assume present data structure with provisioning for the future warehouse model. 0 Student Information System Name of system: ISIS (in-house CICS mainframe source system), much data already in SQL data warehouse refreshed daily, current/active student –class information, no history in warehouse. RDBMS or Vendor Product (i.e., SASI III): ADABAS source, daily ETL to SQL in warehouse Platform: IBM zOS mainframe source, Wintel SQL warehouse Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No Unique student IDs throughout district: 0 Yes 0 No Enrollment statistics in SIS: Yes, approx.360,000 students, extensive data on each as ISIS is a very broad and deep SIS. 0 Testing and Assessment Data Please list the standardized tests you will use to support analysis: FCAT , SAT9, SRI, SAT, ACT collected centrally with FCAT and SAT9 data available in the warehouse from 2001 forward. Other assessment data either not collected centrally or not tracked. School sites administer other assessments through instructional software programs, which vary by school and is available only in school computer labs, classroom computers or school site LANs if at all. Specify the format that the data is received in (i.e., Tape, CD, FTP, flat file, etc.): IBM zOS mainframe source, Wintel SQL warehouse Please describe the availability of the data (i.e., the data is in the district; the data is at another location): District level testing/assessment information is stored in our SIS and most is already in the data warehouse environment and refreshed daily. 0 Finance System Name of system: MSAF RDBMS or Vendor Product: GEAC product uses VSAM Platform: IBM zOS mainframe Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Human Resources System Name of system:Numerous mainframe source systems. RDBMS or Vendor Product:Daily ETL to SQL warehouses. Platform: IBM zOS mainframe source, Wintel SQL data warehouses Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Transportation System Name of system:Data across several mainframe systems. RDBMS or Vendor Product: ETL to SQL data warehouses, 5 years of history in warehouse. Platform: IBM zOS mainframe source, Wintel SQL warehouses. Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No 0 Other Administrative/Data systems Name of system: COMPASS Work Order system RDBMS or Vendor Product: Mainframe Product uses VSAM, ETL to SQL warehouses, 13 months, active WOs only in warehouse, no history. Server Platform: Wintel SQL for warehouses, IBM zOS for source system. Data is exportable: 0 Yes 0 No  
Date Posted : 5/21/2004 6:41:50 PM 
Attachment :

Bid Number : 100-DD04  Opening Date : June 3, 2004
Bid Title : Online Analytical Processing / Business Intelligen 
Buyer : L. Leasburg-Kramer 
Subject : Question submitted and response 
Question : Question 1) Be device independent, e.g. support both Mac and PC Do you intend the device independence to apply to just the delivery of reports via the web (and the printing thereof), or does the device independence you mention refer to the entire thin-client, web based system, and the supporting servers required to provide the requested functionality. 2)What are the database requirements for integration with the other M-DCPS applications (Requirement No. 9)?  
Answer : Response 1) Device independence refers to end-user platform only. Though most desktops in the district are PC compatible, many schools are MAC based. Web based clients must be able to support browser versions that run on Apple MAC computers as well as current PC browsers (IE 5.5 and above), thick clients must be able to support MAC OS 9.22 and above. Server preference is Windows 2000 Advanced Server with IIS 5.0 for the web components and Windows 2000 Advanced Server with SQL Server 2000 for the database component. MDCPS currently operates an enterprise level clustered environment based upon the above. Middle tier servers (application servers) and web sever technology other than that stated above can be accommodated, however, proposer must provide hardware/software cost and scaling information associated with such requirements. 2) Currently MDCPS has a data warehouse for; current/active student, testing and class information, HR, Facilities Work Orders and Transportation using SQL Server 2000 and this is under constant expansion. Most OLAP/BI/MOLAP functions will run against these warehouse tables. Data external to the warehouse that end users may request access to is in mainframe ADABAS files and VSAM files, PC/Server based SQL, Filemaker Pro, Excel, Access, text and csv files. This data is network connected and can be made available in a central server location via FTP. The requirement in the RFP addresses the ability of the software to either import data of various file types (state the file types accommodated by your proposed solution) or access data from these sources external to the data warehouse (through data mapping or other mechanism).  
Date Posted : 5/21/2004 6:47:54 PM 
Attachment :

Bid Number : 100-DD04  Opening Date : June 3, 2004
Bid Title : Online Analytical Processing / Business Intelligen 
Buyer : L. Leasburg-Kramer 
Subject : Response to questions from May 27 2004 
Question : 1. Proposer must provide documentation of being an established software developer and providerfor three years What type of documentation would be adequate here? 2. Proposer must be able to demonstrate that they have the necessary financial resources evidence of this must be indicated by capitalization What type of documentation would be adequate here? The particular concern I have is the word evidence. We are a Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing company, thats really all we do, but what would constitute evidence?  
Answer : 1.Demonstrated installation at a user site, business licensing are examples of documentation that would be accepted. 2. Company financial reports as reported to SEC if Public or Financial Statements through income tax filings.  
Date Posted : 5/28/2004 2:03:57 PM 
Attachment :

Bid Number : 100-DD04  Opening Date : June 3, 2004
Bid Title : Online Analytical Processing / Online Business Int 
Buyer : L. Leasburg-Kramer 
Subject : Question submitted 6/1/2004 
Question : My question is regarding Section V, #6, pricing. I wanted to confirm that under License Cost and Annual Maint/Support Cost you are looking for cost per student or teacher is this correct? The District Licensing section would be if the whole district adopted, is this correct? Secondly, what are you looking for in the Annual Maint./Support Cap %? Please explain this.  
Answer : Response Pricing Per user for a business tool that is normally priced that way. Per student if a K12 product and a District license price. Annual Maint Cap Software has annual maintenance fees. What is the maximum % charged on an annual basis?  
Date Posted : 6/2/2004 9:42:54 AM 
Attachment :

Bid Number : 100-DD04  Opening Date : 6/10/2004
Bid Title : Online Analyttical Processing / Online Business In 
Buyer : Linda Leasburg-Kramer, C.P.M. 
Subject : Questions concerning Demonstration 
Question : 1) How many committee members are there? Would planning for 30 be sufficient?
2) Is this demo in lieu of or in addition to the described 30+ Day proof of concept discussed in the RFP? Just a process clarification for myself and my team...as well as assisting me in scheduling appropriate resources.
3) Are you able to share who the other vendors are that will be participating in the demonstration and will they be in attendance at ours?
4) Have you established a demo criteria or rubric? Are you at liberty to share this with all participants?  
Answer : 1) Plan for 15 copies
2) POC is separate from the demo
3) Copies of proposals are available for view
4) Evaluation will be made by the committee based on the requiremnts of the RFP.  
Date Posted : 11/10/2004 3:25:01 PM 
Attachment :

Back to Top